8.17. The completion phase of the review will include the development of a final review report. There is no single correct way in which the final review report should be organized and presented, and each such report will inevitably need to be customized to the particular review conducted. The regulatory body should consider including the following in the final review report: @@- Introduction : a brief description of the purpose and background of the review, the titles and developers of reviewed documents, summary information about the site, information on the organizations involved in the review, etc. @@- Scope and objectives of the review : high level objectives of the review (including references to the applicable regulatory requirements) and a general overview of the review process as it relates to the scope, etc. If the review report is either a summary (e.g. the final report before licensing) or a partial review report, which will have other supporting review reports that have previously been completed, an overview of these reports should be described here with their general scope and applicability.@@- Applicable regulatory requirements : a list of the regulations, established procedures and/or international recommendations against which the review was carried out. Summaries of the key points of the regulations, procedures and/or international recommendations should be included.@@- Review methodology and process : a description of the procedure for regulatory review including the review plan and the steps in the process (primary review, main review, review of revised documents, etc.), interactions with the operator, categorization of comments, requirements about the format for comments and the manner of identifying comments, interactions within the review team, etc. and resolution of comments.@@- Main results of evaluation : a description of each of the areas reviewed should be documented, with reference to the following areas (including the degree to which the response of the operator to regulatory comments was able to resolve the related issues):@@ ? Key comments : @@ These are the general comments summarizing the main deficiencies of the documents reviewed, concerning high level issues such as the safety strategy, the context, approach and results for the safety case and safety assessment, the treatment of uncertainties (in scenarios, models and parameters), risk management and optimization, compliance with the main regulatory criteria and guidance, appropriate limits and conditions, and the programme for the future development of the safety case. @@ ? Specific comments : @@ These are more detailed review findings concerning the main technical areas of review, the characterization for the disposal facility, the waste inventory and the modelling of radionuclide migration from the disposal facility to the environment, with consideration given to aspects of engineering, geology, hydrogeology, chemistry, climate, biosphere and human intrusion.@@ ? Unresolved issues and uncertainties :@@ These are comments about issues that remain unresolved. Their relative safety significance should be noted together with the actions that will be taken to resolve the comments, if necessary. Any conditions for authorization of the disposal facility should be described and justified here.@@ ? Conclusions :@@ The conclusions of the review should be stated with regard to issues to be considered in licensing or authorization, such as further information to be provided by the operator, revised safety assessment work, monitoring and other controls on the site or the waste, restrictions on the waste inventory, risk management and waste acceptance criteria. In addition, recommendations for conditions for authorization should be listed.@@ ? References : @@ A list of reference documents considered in the review, and underlying review reports that support the final review report. Any guidance documents used in the review should be documented.@@ ? Appropriate information to demonstrate the credentials of the individuals making up the review team.